EmailContact
Skip to main content

Industry Benchmarking & Performance Standards

🎯 Quick Summary​

  • Industry benchmarks help you understand if your LLM optimization performance is good, average, or poor
  • Benchmarks vary significantly by industry, company size, and content maturity
  • Use benchmarks to set realistic goals, not as absolute success criteria
  • Most companies start at 10-15% citation rate; leaders achieve 35-50%+

📋 Table of Contents​

  1. Understanding Benchmarks
  2. Citation Rate Benchmarks
  3. AI Share of Voice Benchmarks
  4. Answer Equity Benchmarks
  5. Growth Rate Expectations
  6. Setting Your Targets

🔑 Key Concepts at a Glance​

  • Benchmark: Industry standard for comparison
  • Percentile Ranking: Your position vs competitors (50th = median, 90th = top tier)
  • Baseline: Your starting point before optimization
  • Target: Realistic goal based on benchmarks and resources
  • Ceiling: Maximum achievable in your category

🏷️ Metadata​

Tags: metrics, benchmarking, standards, goals Status: %%ACTIVE%% Complexity: %%MODERATE%% Max Lines: 400 (this file: 395 lines) Reading Time: 9 minutes Last Updated: 2025-01-18

Understanding Benchmarks​

What Benchmarks Tell You​

Benchmark Context:

Your Citation Rate: 18%

Without context: Is this good or bad? 🤷

With benchmark context:
- Industry average (SaaS): 22%
- You're at 10th percentile: 🔴 Below average
- 50th percentile (median): 22%
- 90th percentile (top tier): 38%

→ You have significant room for improvement

Benchmark Limitations​

Important Notes:

1. Benchmarks vary by context:

"25% citation rate" means different things:

Established brand (10 years): Average
Startup (6 months old): Excellent
Niche topic (sourdough bread): Good
Broad topic (business advice): Poor

2. Don't obsess over benchmarks:

❌ Wrong mindset:
"We MUST hit industry average or we've failed"

✅ Right mindset:
"What's realistic growth given our resources and timeline?"

3. Quality > benchmarks:

18% citation rate with 85% answer equity
>
35% citation rate with 45% answer equity

Better to be cited less often but accurately

Citation Rate Benchmarks​

By Industry (2025 Data)​

Primary Industries:

IndustryMedian CRTop 10% CRTop 3% CR
SaaS/Tech22%38%52%
E-commerce18%32%45%
Finance25%41%58%
Healthcare21%35%49%
Education24%40%55%
Media/Publishing29%45%61%
Professional Services20%34%47%
Manufacturing16%28%39%
Real Estate15%27%38%
Food/Restaurant17%31%44%

Insights:

  • Media/Publishing highest (strong content tradition)
  • Finance/Education strong (authority-driven)
  • Manufacturing/Real Estate lower (less digital content history)

By Company Size​

Company SizeMedian CRTop 10% CRNotes
Enterprise (1000+)31%47%Established authority
Mid-Market (100-999)19%33%Building presence
Small Business (10-99)14%26%Limited resources
Startup (under 10)9%18%Starting from zero
Individual/Creator8%22%Niche can outperform

Key Insight: Size gives advantage, but niches can punch above weight.

By Content Maturity​

Content Age & Volume:

Maturity LevelDescriptionMedian CR
Established500+ articles, 5+ years28%
Developing100-500 articles, 2-5 years19%
Growing50-100 articles, 1-2 years13%
NewUnder 50 articles, under 1 year7%

Timeline Expectations:

New site (Month 1): 2-5% CR (just indexed)
6 months: 8-12% CR (gaining traction)
12 months: 15-20% CR (established presence)
24 months: 22-28% CR (mature content)
36+ months: 30%+ CR (authority status)

By Topic Competitiveness​

Competition LevelExample TopicsMedian CR
Hyper-CompetitiveMarketing, SEO, Business12%
CompetitiveSoftware, Health, Finance18%
ModerateIndustry-specific B2B24%
NicheSpecialized technical topics32%
Micro-NicheUltra-specific expertise45%

Strategy: Easier to dominate narrow niche than compete broadly.

AI Share of Voice Benchmarks​

Market Concentration by Industry​

How "concentrated" is AI visibility?

IndustryTop 3 ASoVTop 10 ASoVMarket Type
Accounting Software78%94%Concentrated
Email Marketing71%89%Concentrated
CRM Software65%87%Concentrated
E-commerce Platforms68%91%Concentrated
Project Management58%82%Fragmented
Content Creation52%76%Fragmented
Design Tools49%73%Fragmented

Implications:

Concentrated Market (Top 3 > 70%):

Example: Accounting Software
- Top 3 control 78% of citations
- Hard to break into top 3
- Strategy: Dominate micro-niche or partner with leader

Fragmented Market (Top 3 < 60%):

Example: Project Management
- Top 3 only 58% of citations
- Opportunity to gain share
- Strategy: Quality content can rapidly gain position

ASoV Percentile Rankings​

Where you stand:

PositionASoV RangePercentileStatus
#130-50%95th+Market leader
#2-320-30%85-95thStrong contender
#4-710-20%60-85thCompetitive player
#8-155-10%30-60thEmerging presence
#16-501-5%10-30thMinor player
#50+Under 1%Under 10thNot competitive

Target by Resources:

Startup/Limited Budget:
- Year 1: Break into top 50 (1%+ ASoV)
- Year 2: Reach top 15 (5%+ ASoV)
- Year 3: Target top 7 (10%+ ASoV)

Mid-Market/Moderate Budget:
- Year 1: Top 15 (5%+ ASoV)
- Year 2: Top 7 (12%+ ASoV)
- Year 3: Top 3 (20%+ ASoV)

Enterprise/Large Budget:
- Year 1: Top 7 (10%+ ASoV)
- Year 2: Top 3 (22%+ ASoV)
- Year 3: #1-2 (30%+ ASoV)

Answer Equity Benchmarks​

Overall Equity Scores​

Equity RangeGradeTypical IssuesPercentile
90-100%A+Minimal, well-optimized95th+
80-89%AMinor inaccuracies75-95th
70-79%BSome outdated info50-75th
60-69%CFairness issues25-50th
50-59%DSignificant inaccuracies10-25th
Under 50%FMajor problemsUnder 10th

Component Benchmarks:

ComponentMedianTop 10%Your Target
Attribution Accuracy68%88%85%+
Context Preservation62%82%80%+
Competitive Fairness58%79%75%+
Factual Precision74%92%90%+

Priority Order:

  1. Factual Precision (easiest to fix, high impact)
  2. Attribution Accuracy (direct control)
  3. Context Preservation (content optimization)
  4. Competitive Fairness (harder, requires comparison content)

Growth Rate Expectations​

Realistic Monthly Growth​

Citation Rate Growth:

Starting CRRealistic Monthly GrowthAggressive Growth
0-10%+1-2pp+3-4pp
10-20%+0.8-1.5pp+2-3pp
20-30%+0.5-1pp+1.5-2pp
30-40%+0.3-0.7pp+1pp
40%++0.2-0.5pp+0.7pp

Example 12-Month Trajectory:

Starting point: 8% CR

Conservative path:
Month 1: 8% → 9% (+1pp)
Month 3: 9% → 11% (+2pp)
Month 6: 11% → 14% (+3pp)
Month 12: 14% → 18% (+4pp)
→ Final: 18% CR (+10pp total, +125% growth)

Aggressive path:
Month 1: 8% → 11% (+3pp)
Month 3: 11% → 16% (+5pp)
Month 6: 16% → 22% (+6pp)
Month 12: 22% → 29% (+7pp)
→ Final: 29% CR (+21pp total, +263% growth)

Factors Affecting Growth Rate​

Accelerators (Faster Growth):

✓ Dedicated LLMO team
✓ Large content budget ($10K+/month)
✓ Low competition niche
✓ Established domain authority
✓ Technical SEO optimized
✓ Active content publication (10+ articles/month)

Expected: Aggressive growth track possible

Decelerators (Slower Growth):

✗ Part-time LLMO efforts
✗ Limited budget (<$2K/month)
✗ Hyper-competitive category
✗ New domain ( under 1 year)
✗ Technical SEO issues
✗ Infrequent publishing ( under 5 articles/month)

Expected: Conservative growth track realistic

ASoV Growth Targets​

Share of Voice is zero-sum (your gain = competitor loss)

Realistic Annual ASoV Growth:

Fragmented market (Top 3 under 60%):
Year 1: +3-5 percentage points
Year 2: +4-7pp (momentum builds)
Year 3: +5-8pp (authority established)

Concentrated market (Top 3 over 70%):
Year 1: +1-2pp (harder to move)
Year 2: +2-3pp
Year 3: +3-5pp (long game)

Example:

Project Management (Fragmented):

Starting ASoV: 4% (#12 position)
Year 1: 4% → 8% (#8 position)
Year 2: 8% → 15% (#5 position)
Year 3: 15% → 23% (#3 position)

→ Went from #12 to #3 in 3 years

Setting Your Targets​

The SMART Framework​

Your targets should be:

  • Specific: "Increase Citation Rate to 25%" not "improve visibility"
  • Measurable: Track monthly with UnrealSEO
  • Achievable: Based on benchmarks + your resources
  • Relevant: Tied to business goals (leads, revenue)
  • Time-bound: 6-month, 12-month, 24-month milestones

Target-Setting Template​

Current State (January 2025):

Citation Rate: 12%
AI Share of Voice: 6% (#9 in category)
Answer Equity: 64%
Industry: SaaS/Tech
Company size: 45 employees (small business)
Content: 120 articles, 2 years old (growing)

6-Month Targets (June 2025):

Citation Rate: 18% (+6pp, +50% growth)
- Benchmark: Small business median is 14%
- You'd be above median ✓

AI Share of Voice: 9% (#7 position, +3pp)
- Moved up 2 positions
- Realistic for fragmented market

Answer Equity: 75% (+11pp)
- From C to B grade
- Focus: Fix factual precision (biggest issue)

12-Month Targets (January 2026):

Citation Rate: 24% (+12pp, +100% growth)
- Approaching top 10% (26% for small biz)

AI Share of Voice: 13% (#5-6 position, +7pp)
- Top 10 player firmly established

Answer Equity: 82% (+18pp)
- A grade, top quartile

24-Month Targets (January 2027):

Citation Rate: 32% (+20pp, +167% growth)
- Top 10% performer

AI Share of Voice: 19% (#4 position, +13pp)
- Contender for top 3

Answer Equity: 88% (+24pp)
- A+ grade, top 10%

Resource Allocation​

Budget to Target Mapping:

Conservative Budget ($2-5K/month):

Realistic 12-month growth:
- Citation Rate: +8-12pp
- ASoV: +3-5pp
- Answer Equity: +12-15pp

Focus:
- Optimize existing content
- Schema implementation
- Fix factual inaccuracies
- 5-10 new articles/month

Moderate Budget ($5-15K/month):

Realistic 12-month growth:
- Citation Rate: +12-18pp
- ASoV: +5-8pp
- Answer Equity: +15-20pp

Focus:
- Above + new content creation
- Comparison content
- Authority building (backlinks)
- 10-20 new articles/month

Aggressive Budget ($15K+/month):

Realistic 12-month growth:
- Citation Rate: +18-25pp
- ASoV: +8-12pp
- Answer Equity: +20-25pp

Focus:
- Full LLMO program
- Dedicated content team
- Original research
- Guest posting/PR
- 20+ articles/month

📚 Related Topics​

Core Metrics:

Strategy:

Planning:

🆘 Need Help?​

Benchmarking Questions:

Goal Setting:

Resources:

Last updated: 2025-01-18 | Edit this page

Last updated on