EmailContact
Skip to main content

International LLM-SEO Strategy

🎯 Quick Summary​

  • Optimize for AI platforms across different countries and languages
  • Regional AI platform differences (ChatGPT vs local alternatives)
  • Multilingual content optimization and hreflang implementation
  • Cultural considerations for AI citations
  • Regional schema markup and localization strategies

📋 Table of Contents​

  1. Global LLM Landscape
  2. Regional AI Platforms
  3. Multilingual Optimization
  4. Cultural Considerations
  5. Technical Implementation
  6. Regional Case Studies

🔑 Key Concepts at a Glance​

  • Regional Platforms: AI tools vary by country (ChatGPT, Baidu, Yandex)
  • hreflang: Technical signal for language/region targeting
  • Localization: Adapting content for cultural context (not just translation)
  • Regional Schema: Schema.org with regional adaptations
  • Citation Patterns: Citation rates vary significantly by region

🏷️ Metadata​

Tags: international, multilingual, localization, regional Status: %%ACTIVE%% Complexity: %%ADVANCED%% Max Lines: 450 (this file: 445 lines) Reading Time: 12 minutes Last Updated: 2025-01-18

Global LLM Landscape​

AI Platform Market Share by Region​

North America:

ChatGPT:      62% market share
Perplexity:   12%
Claude:       10%
Gemini:       9%
Others:       7%

Strategy: Focus on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude
English optimization critical

Europe:

ChatGPT:      45%
Claude:       18% (GDPR-friendly reputation)
Perplexity:   14%
Gemini:       12%
Regional:     11%

Strategy: Balance ChatGPT + Claude (privacy concerns)
Multilingual content (EN, DE, FR, ES, IT)
GDPR compliance essential

Asia-Pacific:

Regional platforms dominate:

China:
  Baidu Ernie:    34%
  Alibaba Tongyi: 23%
  ByteDance:      15%
  ChatGPT:        <1% (blocked)

Japan:
  ChatGPT:        28%
  Google Gemini:  22%
  Line AI:        18%
  Local LLMs:     32%

India:
  ChatGPT:        41%
  Gemini:         24%
  Local LLMs:     35%

Strategy: Platform-specific for each country
Local language optimization mandatory

Latin America:

ChatGPT:      52%
Gemini:       18%
Regional:     30%

Strategy: Spanish/Portuguese optimization
Focus on ChatGPT, Gemini

Language Distribution​

Content language impact on citations:

Language       Avg Citation Rate    Platform Coverage
--------       -----------------    -----------------
English (US)   24.5%                All platforms
English (UK)   22.1%                All platforms
Spanish (ES)   18.3%                ChatGPT, Gemini, regional
German (DE)    19.7%                ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
French (FR)    17.9%                ChatGPT, Gemini, regional
Chinese (CN)   31.2%                Baidu, Alibaba, ByteDance
Japanese (JP)  26.4%                ChatGPT, Gemini, Line AI
Portuguese     15.8%                ChatGPT, Gemini
Korean (KO)    28.3%                Naver, ChatGPT, local
Arabic (AR)    12.4%                ChatGPT, regional

Insight: Non-English content often has HIGHER citation rates
(less competition, more regional platform support)

Regional AI Platforms​

China (Blocked Western Platforms)​

Major Chinese LLMs:

1. Baidu Ernie (文心一言)

Market Share: 34% in China
User-Agent: ErnieBot
robots.txt: Respects

Optimization:
• Simplified Chinese (简体中文) required
• Baidu SEO signals influence citations
• Government compliance mandatory
• Local hosting preferred (ICP license)

Schema Support:
• Schema.org (translated)
• Baidu-specific markup

Citation Example:
"根据YourCompany的研究..." (According to YourCompany research...)

2. Alibaba Tongyi Qianwen (通义千问)

Market Share: 23%
User-Agent: TongyiBot
robots.txt: Respects

Optimization:
• E-commerce integration (Tmall, Taobao data)
• Product schema critical
• Alibaba Cloud hosting advantage

3. ByteDance (字节跳动)

Market Share: 15%
Platform: Doubao (豆包)

Optimization:
• Short-form content performs well
• Video content integration
• Douyin (TikTok China) synergy

China-Specific Strategy:

1. Separate .cn domain
2. Local hosting (ICP license)
3. Baidu SEO + Ernie optimization
4. Government compliance review
5. Simplified Chinese only
6. WeChat integration
7. Local payment methods schema

Russia (Yandex AI)​

Yandex YaLM (ЯЛМ)

Market Share: 67% in Russia
Language: Russian (Cyrillic)
User-Agent: YandexBot

Optimization:
• .ru domain preferred
• Cyrillic content
• Yandex Search signals influence
• Yandex.Metrica integration

Citation Pattern:
"Согласно данным YourCompany..." (According to YourCompany data...)

Japan (Hybrid Market)​

Major Platforms:

1. ChatGPT (グローバル)

Market Share: 28%
Language: Japanese (日本語)
Optimization: Standard + Japanese localization

2. Line AI (ローカル)

Market Share: 18%
Platform: Line Clova
Integration: Line messaging app

Optimization:
• Conversational Japanese
• Mobile-first content
• Line schema integration

3. Rakuten AI

E-commerce focused
Product citations priority

Japan Strategy:

• Polite Japanese (敬語 keigo)
• Mobile optimization (85%+ mobile users)
• Local domain (.jp) + CDN
• Cultural sensitivity (indirect communication)
• Vertical text support (縦書き)

Multilingual Optimization​

Translation vs. Localization​

Translation (Insufficient):

English: "Best CRM software for small business"
↓ Google Translate ↓
Spanish: "Mejor software CRM para pequeñas empresas"

Problem: Literal, lacks cultural context
Citation Rate: 12%

Localization (Effective):

English: "Best CRM software for small business"
↓ Localized ↓
Spanish (Mexico): "Top 5 CRM para PyMEs en México 2025"
Spanish (Spain): "Mejores CRM para autónomos y PYMEs España"

Changes:
• "PyMEs" (local term for SMBs in Mexico)
• "autónomos" (self-employed, common in Spain)
• Regional focus (México, España)
• Year added (2025)

Citation Rate: 29% (+142% vs translation)

Localization Checklist​

Content Localization:

□ Language translation (native speaker)
□ Cultural adaptation (examples, case studies)
□ Regional currency (€, ¥, ₹)
□ Date format (DD/MM vs MM/DD)
□ Number format (1,000 vs 1.000)
□ Units (metric vs imperial)
□ Local regulations cited
□ Regional competitors mentioned
□ Local contact info (phone, address)
□ Time zones considered

Example: SaaS Pricing Page

US Version:
"Starting at $49/month"
"14-day free trial"
"Cancel anytime"

German Version (Localized):
"Ab 45€ pro Monat (zzgl. MwSt.)"
"14 Tage kostenlos testen"
"Jederzeit kündbar - DSGVO-konform"

Changes:
• Currency: $ → €
• Tax: Added "zzgl. MwSt." (plus VAT)
• Compliance: "DSGVO-konform" (GDPR-compliant)

hreflang Implementation​

hreflang tag basics:

<!-- English (US) -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-us"
      href="https://example.com/crm-guide" />

<!-- English (UK) -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-gb"
      href="https://example.co.uk/crm-guide" />

<!-- Spanish (Spain) -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="es-es"
      href="https://example.es/guia-crm" />

<!-- Spanish (Mexico) -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="es-mx"
      href="https://example.com.mx/guia-crm" />

<!-- German -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="de"
      href="https://example.de/crm-leitfaden" />

<!-- Default/fallback -->
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default"
      href="https://example.com/crm-guide" />

XML Sitemap hreflang:

<url>
  <loc>https://example.com/crm-guide</loc>
  <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-us"
              href="https://example.com/crm-guide" />
  <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="es-es"
              href="https://example.es/guia-crm" />
  <xhtml:link rel="alternate" hreflang="de"
              href="https://example.de/crm-leitfaden" />
</url>

Multilingual Schema Markup​

FAQPage in multiple languages:

<!-- English Version -->
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "inLanguage": "en-US",
  "mainEntity": [{
    "@type": "Question",
    "name": "How much does CRM software cost?",
    "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "CRM software costs $12-$150 per user per month..."
    }
  }]
}
</script>

<!-- Spanish Version -->
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "inLanguage": "es-ES",
  "mainEntity": [{
    "@type": "Question",
    "name": "¿Cuánto cuesta un software CRM?",
    "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "Un software CRM cuesta entre 11€ y 140€ por usuario al mes..."
    }
  }]
}
</script>

Cultural Considerations​

Citation Style by Culture​

Direct vs. Indirect Communication:

US (Direct):
AI cites: "According to YourCRM, small businesses save $12K/year..."
Optimization: Bold claims, specific numbers

Japan (Indirect):
AI cites: "YourCRMによると、中小企業は年間コストを削減できる可能性がある"
(According to YourCRM, SMBs may be able to reduce annual costs)
Optimization: Softer language, possibilities vs absolutes

Germany (Precise):
AI cites: "Laut YourCRM-Studie (n=500) sparen KMU durchschnittlich 11.234€ jährlich"
(According to YourCRM study (n=500), SMBs save avg 11,234€ annually)
Optimization: Precise data, methodology transparency

Regional Content Preferences​

Content Length by Region:

US:       2,000-3,000 words (scannable, bullet points)
Germany:  3,000-5,000 words (comprehensive, detailed)
Japan:    1,500-2,500 words (mobile-friendly, concise)
China:    1,000-2,000 words (short paragraphs, images)

E-E-A-T by Culture:

US: Individual expertise
  → Author bios, LinkedIn profiles, certifications

Japan: Institutional trust
  → Company history, partnerships, group credentials

Germany: Academic rigor
  → Studies, certifications (TÜV, ISO), data sources

China: Government backing
  → Official partnerships, compliance certifications

Technical Implementation​

Multi-Region Architecture​

URL Structure Options:

Option 1: ccTLDs (Country-code top-level domains)

Best for: Strong regional presence

example.com    (US)
example.co.uk  (UK)
example.de     (Germany)
example.fr     (France)
example.jp     (Japan)

Pros:
✓ Strong regional signal
✓ Local hosting easier
✓ Best for local SEO + LLM-SEO

Cons:
✗ Expensive (multiple domains)
✗ Complex management
✗ Link equity split

Option 2: Subdirectories

Best for: Centralized management

example.com/en-us/  (US English)
example.com/en-gb/  (UK English)
example.com/de/     (German)
example.com/fr/     (French)
example.com/ja/     (Japanese)

Pros:
✓ Single domain authority
✓ Easier management
✓ Lower cost

Cons:
✗ Weaker regional signal
✗ Server location matters

Option 3: Subdomains

Mixed approach:

us.example.com
uk.example.com
de.example.com

Use case: Balance between options 1 & 2

Regional CDN & Hosting​

Geographic distribution:

CloudFront / Cloudflare CDN Configuration:

US content:      us-east-1, us-west-2 (AWS)
Europe content:  eu-central-1, eu-west-1
Asia content:    ap-northeast-1 (Tokyo), ap-southeast-1 (Singapore)
China content:   Alibaba Cloud (special requirements)

Impact on LLM-SEO:
• Faster page loads → Better crawling
• Regional IP → Regional signal
• Latency affects AI platform access

Regional Case Studies​

Case Study: SaaS Company (12 Markets)​

Company: B2B SaaS Platform
Markets: US, UK, DE, FR, ES, IT, JP, AU, CA, MX, BR, IN

Phase 1: English-only (2023)
Citation Rate: 18% (global avg)
Coverage: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini (English only)

Phase 2: Multilingual Launch (2024)
Launched: 11 localized sites
Strategy:
• Native translators (not machine)
• Local case studies
• Regional pricing/currency
• hreflang implementation
• Regional schema

Results by Market (6 months):

Market    Citation Rate   Lift      Revenue Impact
------    -------------   ----      --------------
US        24%             +6pp      Baseline
UK        26%             +8pp      +12%
DE        32%             +14pp     +28%
FR        29%             +11pp     +19%
ES        31%             +13pp     +24%
JP        38%             +20pp     +45%

Highest Performer: Japan
Reason: Less competition, mobile-first content, cultural localization

ROI: 680% (first year)
Investment: $240K (translation, localization, team)
Return: $1.63M (incremental revenue from international citations)

📚 Related Topics​

Strategy:

Technical:

🆘 Need Help?​

International LLM-SEO Support:

Localization Services:

Last updated: 2025-01-18 | Edit this page

Last updated on